Add & to snippets that require their own line
#44
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit adds the newline (`&`) when it makes sense for a snippet to be written on a newline. For example org src-blocks and headers need to be on their own lines, so if a snippet is called in the middle of a line this will ensure that those snippets are correctly written on the next line.
feat: added newline command to snippets that require newlines
Crandel
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2023
alexforsale
pushed a commit
to alexforsale/tempel-collection
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
&operator will put a snippet onto its own line if the snippet is not already on its own line. I've added this operator when it makes sense to the files/modes/langs I know. I did not touch languages I am not familiar enough with, for example I left Go untouched because I very rarely write Go and I am unfamiliar with that language. This will satisfy #18